In recent years, medical science has faced numerous criticisms. Some critics claim "https://www.allenandunwin.com/browse/books/general-books/current-affairs-politics/Selling-Sickness-Ray-Moynihan-argue</a> that fictitious disease categories are being created, and existing ones broadened, for profit. Others https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/an-epidemic-of-false-claims/" argue that the benefits of most new drugs are minimal and often exaggerated by clinical research, while the harms are significant and typically downplayed. Additionally, some https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/3901/the-truth-about-the-drug-companies-by-marcia-angell-md/ criticize the research methods themselves, stating that methods once considered gold standards in clinical research—randomized trials and meta-analyses—are actually flexible and have been manipulated to favor industry interests over patient care. The chief editor of The Lancet medical journal summarized these criticisms in 2015: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)60696-1/fulltext"
Time for gentler medicine -courtesy Aeon
Want to read more?
Subscribe to sustainablevetcare.com to keep reading this exclusive post.